Image by Mohamed Hassan from Pixabay
In the realm of software development, the “build versus buy” debate is a classic. When a new capability is needed, teams face a fundamental choice: invest resources to create a custom solution from scratch or purchase a ready-made product from a vendor. This dilemma is especially relevant when it comes to Static Application Security Testing (SAST). The promise of a perfectly tailored, homegrown SAST solution is tempting, but the reality is often far more complex than it appears.
Deciding how to approach sast tools is not just a technical choice; it’s a strategic business decision with long-term consequences for your budget, your team’s focus, and your overall security posture. It requires a clear-eyed analysis of the costs, benefits, and hidden complexities of each path. Let’s break down this critical decision to help you determine which approach is right for your organization.
The Allure of Building: The Dream of a Perfect Fit
The primary argument for building your own SAST tool is control. On the surface, the idea of creating a scanner that is perfectly attuned to your specific technology stack, coding conventions, and security requirements is incredibly appealing.
Potential Pros of Building:
- Customization: A homegrown tool can be designed to do exactly what you want, without the feature bloat or missing capabilities of a commercial product. You can tailor rules to eliminate common false positives specific to your codebase.
- No Licensing Fees: While it’s far from “free,” building your own solution means you avoid recurring subscription or licensing costs from a third-party vendor.
- Deep Integration: You can weave a custom tool into your unique development workflows and internal systems in ways that might be difficult with an off-the-shelf product.
However, the path of building is fraught with hidden challenges that many teams underestimate. It’s not just about writing a script; it’s about building, maintaining, and supporting a complex piece of enterprise software.
The Hidden Costs and Complexities of Building:
- The Enormous Upfront Investment: Creating a robust SAST engine is a monumental task. It requires deep expertise in compiler theory, language parsing, and, most importantly, security vulnerabilities. Assembling a team with this niche skill set is both difficult and expensive.
- The Never-Ending Maintenance: The world of security does not stand still. New vulnerability classes are discovered, programming languages evolve, and frameworks are updated constantly. Your internal team becomes responsible for keeping the scanner’s rules and engine up-to-date. This isn’t a one-time project; it’s a permanent resource commitment.
- The Support Burden: When the scanner produces a false positive or misses a critical vulnerability, who fixes it? Your internal engineering team. This diverts your most valuable resources—your developers—away from building your core product and into the business of tool maintenance.
Building your own SAST tool is akin to deciding to build your own company cars instead of buying them. While you could theoretically design the perfect vehicle for your needs, you are now in the auto manufacturing business, which is not your core competency.
The Pragmatism of Buying: Leveraging Specialized Expertise
The “buy” option involves purchasing a commercial or subscribing to an open-source supported SAST solution. This approach is based on the principle of leveraging the focused expertise of a dedicated provider.
The Pros of Buying:
- Immediate Time-to-Value: You can have a sophisticated, enterprise-grade SAST tool up and running in days, not months or years. The product is ready to be integrated into your CI/CD pipeline, providing immediate security feedback.
- Access to Specialized Expertise: SAST vendors have entire teams of security researchers and engineers dedicated to a single task: finding vulnerabilities in code. They are constantly updating their rule sets to cover the latest threats and language features, an effort that is nearly impossible for a non-specialized internal team to replicate. Organizations like OWASP provide extensive research that top-tier vendors incorporate into their products.
- Lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO): While there is a direct cost associated with buying a tool, the TCO is often significantly lower than building. When you factor in the salaries of the dedicated team required to build and maintain a custom tool, the opportunity cost of pulling developers off product work, and the risk of an inferior solution, buying becomes the more financially sound option for most organizations.
- Support and Community: Commercial tools come with dedicated support teams to help you with implementation, tuning, and troubleshooting. Open-source tools often have vibrant communities and enterprise support options, meaning you’re never on your own.
The Cons of Buying:
- Direct Cost: There are licensing or subscription fees to consider.
- Potential for Inflexibility: An off-the-shelf tool may not fit your unique workflows perfectly, though modern tools are highly configurable.
- Dependency on a Vendor: You are reliant on the vendor’s roadmap for new features and updates.
Making the Right Decision: A Strategic Framework
For the vast majority of companies, the verdict is clear: buying a SAST tool is the more strategic, secure, and cost-effective choice. The resources, specialized knowledge, and continuous effort required to build and maintain a competing internal solution are simply too great. The security landscape evolves too quickly. Leading research firms like Gartner consistently analyze the application security testing market, showcasing the immense R&D investment vendors pour into their products.
The decision framework should look like this:
- Assess Your Core Competency: Is your company in the business of building security tools, or are you building something else? Your engineering resources are best spent creating value for your customers.
- Calculate the True Cost: Go beyond licensing fees. Estimate the fully-loaded salaries of the engineers you would need to dedicate to building and maintaining a SAST tool indefinitely.
- Evaluate the Risk: What is the security risk of using an internally developed tool that may not be as comprehensive or up-to-date as a market-leading product?
Unless you are a massive technology company with a dedicated security research division, the smart money is on buying. By choosing a proven SAST tool, you are not just acquiring software; you are partnering with specialists, freeing your team to focus on what they do best: building great products.
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only. It does not give legal, financial, or professional advice. Always check with experts before making decisions about security tools.
Dorothy I. Johnson is the heart and soul of Flash Flyer Blog’s writing team. Dorothy loves storytelling and finds the extraordinary in everyday life. She has a unique voice for sharing travel stories, tech trends, wellness tips, and food finds. Her relatable style makes complex ideas easy to grasp. She also turns simple moments into captivating stories. Dorothy’s background and curiosity inspire her to make content that connects with readers. They can find either practical tips or new viewpoints in her work. When she’s not writing, she likes to explore new places. She experiments in the kitchen or dives into a new personal growth book.
